|
12/28
Anticipation
The Confidence Game...Well, the
anticipation of a happy Christmas holiday for the retail community
is now but a memory. You may remember that a few weeks ago
we spent a few minutes discussing the possibility of a blue
Christmas (Sky Blue and Black).
Same store sales for the retail community rose 4+% for the week
prior to the Holiday, but the preceding three weeks since
Thanksgiving were some of the worst retailers had experienced in
four years. For December in aggregate, retail sales will
probably clock in somewhere above the 2% line. Maybe 2.5-3%
if lucky. The current "week after Christmas"
period in which we now find ourselves is an important one.
On average, 11% of total Holiday sales occur in the week after
Christmas. 9% is typically rung up over the Thanksgiving
weekend. Is the world simply coming to an end? Not
quite, but for many it may feel like that after 6.5-7% same store
sales gains experienced one year ago. Although quite
illustrative, you don't need the following chart to know that we
are living through a rather dramatic period of retail sales growth
deceleration:
Over the last ten years, average annual same
store sales gains in December registered 3.8%. God forbid,
we've now returned to normalcy? As you know, the much bigger
question is where we go from here. In essence, do we
overshoot to the downside in terms of deceleration? The
ultimate swing of the pendulum.
During the Holiday season, online sales were
estimated to be up approximately 30%. Again, a far cry from
last year's 100%+ numbers, but we are watching the evolution of
the online retail delivery channel. Undoubtedly it will
continue to be super important ahead, just not at breakneck
pace. With these kinds of online numbers, it's simply a sure
bet that more e-tail dotcom's will be surfacing as DOA's in the
months ahead. You may have noticed the recent Priceline ads
proclaiming "we'll be here in 2001". Just who are
they trying to convince? Themselves? In a clearly
anecdotal post close story today, GE shut down Montgomery Wards
after a "disappointing Holiday season". As you may
know, Bradlees, another discounter in the Northeast, announced a
liquidation earlier in the week. There go the
employees. There go the guaranteed property rental
leases. These actions scream that America is too
"over-retailed" within the context of an economic
slowdown. There is more pain to come. Although our
memory is clearly fuzzy, we cannot remember a time in the
company's history when Home Depot offered 10% off everything in
the store sale, as it did recently in the days before
Christmas. With all of the discounting that was sure to have
occurred to eek out the aggregate retail sales gains for December,
retail bottom lines will not be a sight for sore eyes.
They'll just be sore.
The reason we brought up retail sales a few
weeks back and choose to briefly address it again is because we
believe retail sales may be making a much bigger statement on
confidence in general. Consumer confidence. Confidence
in the financial markets. Confidence in the domestic and
ultimately global economy. Confidence in the balance sheets
of the American public. America is a country that has been
built on self confidence. And yes, it has lived through
periods of over confidence before, only to rise again after a
usually drawn out period of financial and emotional
reconciliation. It just so happens that the Conference Board
announced the Consumer Confidence number for December today.
The number was not good, as you would expect. The worst in
two years. The drop in consumer confidence during the last
three months has been one of the four worst quarterly experiences
on record. One being just prior to the 1980 recession.
Another being just prior to the 1990 recession. The last
being in 1998. The following chart is a near term
retrospective:
The Ultimate Discounting Mechanism...By
and large, economists and Street strategists are confident that
the current economy is headed for the proverbial soft
landing. Talk of recession creeps up now and again in the
mainstream, but professionals are far from fully anticipating this
type of eventual outcome. Confidence and anticipation in the
Greenspan Fed's ability to "stop the leaking" still
reigns the day. In our minds, what happens in the months
ahead in terms of both the direction of the real economy and the
financial market's reaction to interest rate cuts and potential
tax cuts is critical in trying to develop some assessment of how
bad this economic deceleration may become.
Over the weekend, Gene Epstein in Barron's
opined that until real estate sales taper off, it's too early to
call for a recession. The implication was that bear markets
in stocks (this time the NASDAQ) don't necessarily mean that the
economy will follow into a recession. We happen to agree
that this train of thought has a lot of validity. What must
be monitored, though, is market action post the initial
stock index declines and early economic deceleration onset.
The 1962 bear market was not followed by an immediate
recession. The 1987 crash/bear market was not immediately
followed by a recession. The 1998 mini bear market was also
not followed by a recession. The common underlying element
in each case is that the stock market quickly recovered from these
brief bouts of confidence implosion. Stock prices were on
their way back up in a very short period of time. Will that
also be the case this time? The answer lies directly
ahead. As a last comment, housing sales may not be the
indicator they once were in this special environment as excess
credit creation of the moment is clearly not flowing into either
stocks or retail sales. Real estate seems to be the last
inflating asset left standing...for now.
LEI-I-I...The leading economic
indicators have deteriorated pretty rapidly and consistently over
the last eight months. Only a revised September number
provided a temporary break in an otherwise eight month losing
streak:
What is clearly anecdotal in the chart above
is that during 1998, despite the stock market fall, the LEI was
trending upward. This time around its movement is coincident
with the financial markets. Moreover, nominal GDP growth
since the market's high last March has been the worst three
quarter deceleration since the 1990 recession. Likewise, the
current yield curve is more inverted than that experienced during
the last recession:
Chicago PMI is currently the weakest
recorded since the 1990 recession. Unlike most anything we
have seen in the last decade or so, give or take a few months,
capex spending on technology is in trouble. Layoffs have
begun to rise. The Wards closure action just today meant
37,000-plus jobs. Most disturbing to us is the marked
escalation in debt related problems for the corporate
sector. A financially crippled Xerox. LTV
contemplating bankruptcy after today's close due to lack of
cash. Chrysler running out of cash. ATT cutting the
dividend significantly to preserve cash against a heavily levered
balance sheet. The Pacific G&E and So. Cal Edison
deregulation financial squeeze episode. Auto production
cutbacks at Ford and GM's shuttering of the Olds division.
Lucent and Cisco paying for the sins of overconfidence in
customers. Lastly, the Japanese economy seems to be heading
for a recession itself. At best, it's clearly a weak link in
the global economic chain. Corporate bankruptcies reached an
all time high in Japan during 2000. We're not ready to
scream recession dead ahead, but it's sure beginning to feel that
way. As we stated, we will be intently watching the economic
numbers ahead and, quite importantly, the action of the stock
market. According to Paul Samuelson, the stock market may
have predicted 9 of the last 5 recessions, but if it does not perk
up soon, we're going to have to bet that record is moving to 10
out of the last 6.
ANTICIPATION...The stock market is
about nothing if not anticipation. Discounting the future is
its sworn solemn duty in life. The job of the investor is to
try to decipher just how much of the future has already been
impounded in current stock prices at any point in time. Much
easier said than done. Maybe that's why we have never met a
"system" that works on a continuous basis. The
only system we know is to attempt to use every fundamental and
technical tool in our arsenal to try to arrive at some type of common
sense judgment regarding values set against the backdrop of the consensus
anticipation of the crowd.
We ask you, what could be more widely
anticipated at the moment than Fed interest rate cuts? This
has to be one of the most anticipated events we have seen in
years. Sure, Y2K was anticipated, but it's outcome in
foresight was uncertain. From our vantage point, a cut in
interest rates by the Fed in the near future is an event
characterized by certainty in anticipation. Enough
philosophical diatribe. (If we don't watch it, the anticipated
rate cut will soon take on the aura of existentialism. I
choose it, therefore it will happen.) What we want to
explore is the discounting mechanism. As we listen to Wall
Street strategists and many economists, the promulgation of
thought is that once rates are cut, all will be on the mend with
financial assets and the real economy. We've already
documented to you in past discussions the lag effects of monetary
policy in the real economy. Although ultimately important to
real world events and relationships, the rate cut may potentially
be important over a near term basis on Wall Street for one reason
and one reason only. Perceptions. Perceptions and the
confidence they either do or do not instill.
Anticipation has already set in in a big way
in UST bond prices. The following chart of the Fed Fund
futures already incorporate the anticipation of a pretty dramatic
drop in rates over the next few months:
God help the bond market and Fed Funds
futures players if the anticipated almost 100 basis points of
cutting does not transpire over the next six months.
The chart of the Treasury curve we show
above was done at the close on the 27th. Today's curve closed as
follows:
|
MATURITY |
YIELD |
|
|
|
6 Mo. |
5.78 % |
|
1 YR |
5.41 |
|
2 YR |
5.15 |
|
5 YR |
5.02 |
|
10 YR |
5.12 |
|
30 YR |
5.44 |
Maybe our observations are too simplistic,
but all else being equal and assumed static, a 100 basis point cut
in the Fed Funds rate in the next six months will still leave us
with an inverted yield curve out to ten years. Has the bond
market already fully discounted a significant short rate
decline? Of course it has. The real question is
"has it more than discounted the eventual total short rate
decline?". That remains to be seen over the next half
year to year. Again, quite simplistically, if the bond
market has correctly discounted the ultimate need to cut short
rates drastically, it is implicitly arguing that the economy is
poised to fall directly into recession. Again, if true, just
what has the stock market discounted? Is Oracle priced for a
recession? Is GE priced for a recession? Is Wells
Fargo priced for a recession? We could go on and on.
Possibly the bond market has discounted too much and the stock
market not enough.
The following charts of the five and ten
year Treasury price action over the last month demonstrate that
yields are already within fifty basis points of the bottom seen in
rates during the 1998 monetary easing exercise. As you know,
rates reached these bottom levels after short rates had
already begun to be cut.

Could this possibly be one of the biggest
examples of "buy the rumor and sell the news" we have
experienced in many a moon? Be prepared. And not just
for bonds. With recent retail sales clearly indicating
consumption apprehension on the part of the American public, do
you really believe Americans will be in the mood to
"consume" more stocks just because interest rates have
been cut? Maybe...for a while. After all, that's what
bear market rallies are made of, aren't they?.
Stand And Deliver...Having laid out
our thoughts on price anticipation in the bond market surrounding
what seems to be impending interest rate cuts, we have to give our
fearless forecast for what may lie ahead. Are we
certain? Not in the least. Just trying to anticipate
probable outcomes. Be prepared for a possible 50 basis point
rate cut out of the box for the Fed. We would guess it would
be 50bp's on the Jan. 31 FOMC meeting, but it could be an early 25
and a Jan. 31 25 bp rate cut if Al hits the panic button in
advance. Why 50 basis points? As you know, the Bush
regime will most likely make an income tax cut issue numero uno
after the inauguration. (This is also a point of
anticipation, as you know.) Knowing this in advance, the Fed
may just choose to go into a little quiet period while the
Congressional/Presidential sparks fly regarding fiscal tax
policy. 50 basis points may be what the Fed would feel is
necessary to "tide the market over" while the tax issue
is decided. Also, once the tax drama is played out, the Fed
may be in a position to make more intelligent decisions regarding
the combined effects of simultaneous monetary and fiscal policy
ahead in setting further monetary actions. How would the
financial markets take this? Well, in one of two ways, of
course. It's either YIPEE, LET'S PARTY!! Or, oh cr*p,
this (the economy) is worse than we thought.
Deferred Liability...You may remember
that we wrote a piece a while back about the embedded unrealized
capital gains in many an equity mutual fund. Incredibly
enough, we pulled up the Vanguard S&P 500 fund record for 2000
and this is what we found:
|
VANGUARD
S&P 500 INDEX FUND |
|
YEAR |
NAV |
Cap
Gains Paid Out |
Div.
Income Paid Out |
|
|
|
1990 |
$31.24 |
$
0.10 |
$
1.17 |
|
1991 |
39.32 |
0.12 |
1.15 |
|
1992 |
40.97 |
0.10 |
1.12 |
|
1993 |
43.83 |
0.03 |
1.13 |
|
1994 |
42.97 |
0.20 |
1.17 |
|
1995 |
57.6 |
0.13 |
1.22 |
|
1996 |
69.17 |
0.25 |
1.28 |
|
1997 |
90.07 |
0.59 |
1.32 |
|
1998 |
113.95 |
0.42 |
1.33 |
|
1999 |
135.55 |
1.00 |
1.41 |
|
2000
YTD |
122.66 |
0 |
1.30 |
|
|
|
2000
NAV Less 1990 NAV |
$
91.42 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$
2.94 |
$
13.60 |
Unless they are going to declare a capital
gain tomorrow, we cannot find them either having paid or declaring
a capital gain in the 500 fund during 2000. As you can see,
this is the first time in eleven years where this has
happened. As of the close today, there are $91.42 per share
of unrealized gains in this fund on a closing price of
$122.66. That's right, 74.5% of this fund is made up of
unrealized gain. We're not trying to pick on Vanguard by any
means. In fact, we have a lot of respect for them.
This little display during 2000 was a masterful job of
experiencing a down year and not distributing tax pain to
investors on top of it. Fine for 2000, but this is one fund
where the possibility of redemptions would take a heavy toll on
taxable investors. The industry wide problem of embedded
capital gains is not over by a long shot.
The Daily Breadth...Will the January
effect visit us this year? Especially after the
"educational" September through December effect we have
just lived through? Certainly possible. Tax selling
pressures will have subsided. Anticipation of monetary and fiscal
largesse should heat up. A lot of bad earnings
preaanouncements are out of the way (of course, with a few to
follow post Jan. 1). Investors have not bailed from equity
mutual funds. That tells us the psychology of the faith in
stocks has not been broken yet. We would not be surprised at
all to see a potential lift in 1Q of next year. If not, we
will make the bet that recession lies within 6-9 months. 
Chart Courtesy of StockCharts.com

Chart Courtesy of StockCharts.com
|