|
10/19 Getting
Down To Brass Tax
It's That Time Of The Year...That's
right, tax loss selling season. And this year is already
shaping up as something special as losses just seem to arise out of
nowhere just about every day. So many to choose from, so
little time. The mutual fund crowd
closes it's tax books at October month end. Individuals have
until the end of the year to cheat the government out of its fair
share of capital gains tax revenues. The issue of not only
individual security tax loss selling, but more importantly the tax
issues involved in mutual funds are taking front and center
stage. This year there are some very important twists that may
affect market action more than one would expect. For
starters, and since we are being a bit lazy, the following is a
reprint of something we published about one and one half years
ago. (A few sentences have been inserted and some changed to
update the "action" a bit.) It's a darn good bet
that the concepts presented are finally coming home to roost.
For readers who have seen this before, we apologize. For
those who haven't, take a quick peek and then well get to some
concrete number examples and discuss the potential market effects
looking out over the next few months.
Unrealized
Capital Gains: The Dirty Little Secret Of The Mutual Fund
Industry
Up until now, we have been
the beneficiaries of the greatest bull market of all time.
During this decade alone, the public has written the mutual fund
industry a depository check for over $1.2 trillion dollars.
What a great deal as investors have enjoyed increased paper wealth.
Most believe this will continue as far as the eye can see. The
trust in paper generation of wealth is truly extraordinary.
For those still wondering just how this market has risen to such a
"thin air" atmosphere, we happen to have over a trillion
reasons why.
With the torrent of cash
flowing into mutual funds, those who have chosen to redeem over the
past three to four years have been easily accommodated with
immediate payment. No need for funds to do a lot of selling to
meet redemption's. Net inflows have swamped the demand from
those who have chosen to leave the party early. With the top
S&P cowboys whooping it up the loudest over the past three
years, there has been absolutely no sense of urgency on the part of
fund managers to sell the Microsoft's, the Cisco's, the GE's, etc.
In fact, they eagerly continued to buy as these balloons lofted ever
skyward.
As you know, mutual funds
pass out both dividend income and capital gains each year. No
need to really worry about the dividends as we are currently
clocking in at one of the lowest yield levels ever recorded in US
financial history (and have been for some time). For taxable
investors it's a minor inconvenience of the moment. Capital
gains realizations, however, can be driven by many variables.
(Thank God for the current crop of talented fund managers, as a
sense of history and valuation are clearly not among their
"variables" for selling.) The spectacular
performance of the markets, especially over the last three years,
has not been matched by capital gains distributions of the mutual
fund industry. Clearly there are unrealized gains embedded in
these funds awaiting ultimate distribution. Even beyond the
last three years, this has been the greatest long term bull market
of all time whose origins date back to the early 1980's.
Mutual fund managers have historically been relatively sensitive to
the realization of annual gains. For taxable investors, it's
an immediate rebate to Uncle Sam. What's so bad about
unrealized gains? At this point, even with a rotten market
this year, a large number of investors in America still have some
type of unrealized gains in funds or individual securities.
We believe the problem will
initially be felt by new taxable investors who have purchased stock
oriented mutual funds in the eighteen months or so. Imagine a scenario
where we go into a protracted (2-3 yr.) bear market and the public
decides to sell 20% of their stock fund holdings. Just 20%.
(We know this is a stretch for some, but believe us, it is well
within the realm of human possibility.) Newcomers to
stock funds will not only lose value in a bear market, but will also
be distributed capital gains they were never there to enjoy in the
first place. Imagine losing money and making a very big
tax payment for the privilege. In this scenario, it isn't just
new investors that face losing value and paying taxes. If the
markets don't shape up, and soon, this will be a common theme among
the majority of fund holders this year. If we get to the point
where the public
demands fund redemption's, the greater this embedded gain tax
problem will become. It's axiomatic that former winners
are sold to meet redemptions because the former winners are the
last to lose liquidity. In today's 800 number mutual fund
nirvana, redemption means now (1-800-GETMEOUT). Not when it's
convenient. Not in the next rally. Now. In a bear
market, liquidity will be sold (hard). We are already seeing
this. This is clearly not the kind of experience that reinforces the
"I'm a long term investor" swagger. This scenario is
not so hard to imagine at all. It may be right around the
corner.
If you think stock oriented
mutual funds are a problem, think about the index funds. Fully
invested by nature at all times. No cash. Ever.
The recipients of mountains of cash during the 1990's.
The embedded gains have to be staggering. (You will get a
sense for just how staggering in the table below.) Index funds
will be a taxable investor nightmare in a bear market accompanied
and abetted by public selling. It's no fun losing money.
It's no fun paying taxes. Pour in equal amounts. Shake
vigorously, and you have the perfect LTHS cocktail (Long term
horizon shortener). Redemption of index funds may become a
particular problem. We didn't mean to spoil Happy Hour.
Anyone for another drink?
Up until now we have
quietly suggested the public would redeem and set off the tax
fireworks. The ultimate irony may turn out to be that the
mutual fund managers themselves spark the selling by trying to
maintain performance in a bear market. (As you know, this is
accomplished by losing the least amount of money relative to your
peers.) Either way, we believe this unrealized gain/tax
problem will be a major concern in the next bear market as a
potential driver of fund liquidation's. At least when you own
individual securities you do not have to sell and trigger any gains.
It's a huge difference from the mutual fund complex as your neighbor
can become your biggest problem. If your neighbor sells,
he/she may generate a tax problem for you.
So you're not a taxable
investor. You're safely tucked away in a 401(k) and you
are definitely in it for the long term (at least for now).
Taxes are not a problem. Could the taxable seller drive the
market at the margin? Could be. That's our concern for
what may end up being the perceptual effect on the non-taxable
investor. This issue is really an anecdotal negative for the
"future files". It will not be the cause of a bear
market. But, in bear markets, it's often movements at the
increment that surprise you. If you own mutual funds, go back
and look at investment percentage gains versus percentage capital
gains distributions for your funds. Be aware of the potential
powder keg of unrealized gains potential. We posit the humble
suggestion that perhaps it would be wiser to sell a fund entirely
and pay the capital gains on the entirety rather than being
bludgeoned by capital gains distributions during a bear market and
losing value at the same time (and still not have paid your entire
personal capital gain of market over cost). Is it time to bail
out of your favorite taxable stock/index funds? Using
Alan Greenspan's words of comfort, relax, "we'll only know it
was a bubble if it bursts". Thank God. Now we feel
a lot better. Alan, has it burst yet?
Not All Funds Are Created Equal...Let's
have a look at some numbers so you can get a sense of what investors
potentially face. The source for the numbers is none other
than Morningstar. First, the big kahnua non-index fund (sort of),
Fidelity Magellan:
|
FIDELITY
MAGELLAN |
|
Year |
NAV |
Cap.
Gains Paid Out |
Div.
Income Paid Out |
|
|
|
1990 |
$
53.93 |
$
2.42 |
$
0.83 |
|
1991 |
68.61 |
5.43 |
1.30 |
|
1992 |
63.01 |
8.82 |
1.25 |
|
1993 |
70.85 |
6.50 |
0.75 |
|
1994 |
66.80 |
2.64 |
0.13 |
|
1995 |
85.98 |
4.69 |
0.59 |
|
1996 |
80.65 |
12.85 |
1.10 |
|
1997 |
95.27 |
5.21 |
1.25 |
|
1998 |
120.82 |
5.15 |
0.67 |
|
1999 |
136.63 |
11.39 |
0.73 |
|
|
|
1999
NAV Less 1990 NAV |
$
82.70 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$
65.10 |
$
8.60 |
First a few observations in this and the
tables to come. NAV's (Net Asset Values) are net of
annual gains and dividend distributions, so we are certainly not double
counting here. In this and the following tables, pay
particular attention to the years 1996 and beyond. As you
know, a ton of money poured into the funds in the past few
years. Likewise, the market obliged by going higher (on the
back of that money)...until now. Magellan
has actually done a decent job of passing out gains over time.
This clearly shows that there was active management of the
portfolio. Although we do not have the numbers for 2000, we
understand that manager Bob Stansky and friends blew out of a fair
chunk of their tech holdings some months back. Assuredly
capital gains distributions are on their way unless some pretty big
tax loss selling has/will have taken place. Probably
the biggest single holder of unrealized gains we can think of is the
following:
|
VANGUARD
S&P 500 INDEX FUND |
|
YEAR |
NAV |
Cap.
Gains Paid Out |
Div.
Income Paid Out |
|
|
|
1990 |
$
31.24 |
$
0.10 |
1.17 |
|
1991 |
39.32 |
0.12 |
1.15 |
|
1992 |
40.97 |
0.10 |
1.12 |
|
1993 |
43.83 |
0.03 |
1.13 |
|
1994 |
42.97 |
0.20 |
1.17 |
|
1995 |
57.6 |
0.13 |
1.22 |
|
1996 |
69.17 |
0.25 |
1.28 |
|
1997 |
90.07 |
0.59 |
1.32 |
|
1998 |
113.95 |
0.42 |
1.33 |
|
1999 |
135.33 |
1.0 |
1.41 |
|
|
|
1999
Nav Less 1990 NAV |
$
104.09 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$
2.94 |
$12.3 |
The table basically says it all. Capital
gains passed out of the Vanguard 500 fund over the last ten years
are negligible at best. Even lowly dividend income has
surpassed gains realizations by over four to one. If ever
Vanguard faces relatively significant redemptions, capital gains
realizations will be a given. By nature, the bull market has
created an incredible amount of unrealized gains in this and most
all index funds. Lastly, as a final
example the following table is Chip Morris' T. Rowe Science and
Technology Fund:
|
T.ROWE
PRICE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY |
|
YEAR |
NAV |
Cap.
Gains Paid Out |
Div.
Income Paid Out |
|
|
|
1990 |
$
10.05 |
$
0.24 |
$
0.09 |
|
1991 |
15.57 |
0.48 |
0 |
|
1992 |
17.33 |
1.12 |
0 |
|
1993 |
18.95 |
2.51 |
0 |
|
1994 |
21.64 |
0.30 |
0 |
|
1995 |
29.12 |
4.54 |
0 |
|
1996 |
29.71 |
3.6 |
0 |
|
1997 |
27.26 |
2.87 |
0 |
|
1998 |
37.67 |
0.99 |
0 |
|
1999 |
63.71 |
10.72 |
0 |
|
|
|
1999
Nav Less 1990 NAV |
$
53.66 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$27.37 |
$
0.09 |
Relatively few gains realizations until last
year. Pre gains distributions, this fund was up close to
100% last year. Morris may be the anomaly in that his
experience taught him to take some chips off the table (no pun
intended). What's Ahead?...If
mutual fund managers were looking to offset capital gains realized
earlier in the year, they have had plenty of opportunity to do so
over the last month and one half. Clearly the action in the
major indices and stocks has been more than tax loss selling
effects. The typical pattern each year is that the weak
stocks get weaker as you move through September and into October
as the funds square up pro forma capital distributions
positions. This year it was many of the former strong that
blew up along with the weak getting weaker. At
the moment, what is unknowable is how much selling was done for
momentum or portfolio management reasons and how much for tax loss
reasons. In fact we have had two major events this year for
much of the beloved and over owned tech universe. The
April/May Nasdaq hit and the September/October Nasdaq hit.
Regardless of tax loss planning, many a portfolio manager may have
been unloading the favorites (MSFT, INTC, CSCO, DELL, etc.) just
to conserve sheer performance. We have to believe that this
type of action created a lot of gains, possibly unintended gains,
as these were the very stocks that delivered the bulk of
investment performance over the last few years. To offset
those unintended gains taken for investment performance reasons,
there may have been extraordinary pressure on other liquid sectors
of the market in September and October just for tax neutralization
reasons. If so, a broad based bounce post the bulk of tax
loss squaring is not an unreasonable assumption. Be prepared
for a move based at least partly on lack of pressure, not
necessarily massive buying. The
Role Of The Mutual Fund Investor...It's been somewhat
axiomatic that investors refrain from putting gobs of money into
mutual funds near year end strictly to avoid capital gains
distributions in mid to late December. In the greed driven
market of the past few years, this has meant nothing as money has
plowed in regardless of distributions. In fact the
monetarily driven NASDAQ blast off in October of 1999 sucked in
money straight through distribution season. This year may be
a bit different. Could it be that
investors sell their funds prior to distribution time strictly to
avoid potential gains distributions in what has been a down
year? It could be. After all, this could be the first
year in many a moon where investors have down performance and they
are forced to pay taxes on distributed gains. A little slap
in the face. Possibly a stark education also. It really depends on individual situations, embedded
long term gains in their specific funds, etc. If a certain
amount of mutual fund holders sell to avoid gains distributions
nearer year end, that could indeed create more selling pressure in
the months ahead (possibly counteracting the lifting of selling
pressure from the fund complex). You
know and we know that at some point, investors are going to want
their money back. A significant drop from here (20%+) would
probably get the ball rolling as recent declines have actually
caused mom and pop investors to "start asking
questions". We believe the embedded capital gain
issue may begin to receive much more attention in the months
ahead. Be prepared. Just
Another Day...Ho hum. Two near record percentage moves
in the NAZ in the past five trading days. Yawn.
Getting a little boring, isn't it? What can be done to
really spice things up around here anyway? You know tomorrow
(Friday) is options expiration. Let us pose a simple
question. Suppose for a minute you are a hedge fund long
momentum tech stocks at the end of August. You had a pretty
nasty slap. Did you just sit there through September and
early October and just take what was coming to you? Of
course you didn't. Chances are you shorted the NDX futures
or put on some other creative hedge. When the NDX futures
bolt out of the starting gate like last Friday and today, you
quietly and humbly GET THE HELL OUT. No questions
asked. Could it be that something like this may have had a
bit to do with today's little romp? Funny GE was down on a
day when the S&P was up over 3%. It's just a good thing
that all the top NDX dogs and S&P top tech were spiking to
make up for it. We've shown you
the following chart before and now here's an update. Classic
Edwards and Magee topping formation "diamond
pattern". Behold the "Dow Diamond dogs":
It
Ain't Over Till It's Over...Anything can happen in the wacky
market environment of the present. Now that the earnings are
out of the way, maybe the party will continue. Folks now
have the chance to buy many of their favorite techs at what is
perceived as sale prices. The only hang up is that the techs
will go into the 4Q confessional box in about 8-10 more
weeks. Oh well, that's basically a lifetime in the new
era. We present the following
S&P chart for long term perspective. Patience is a
virtue, even in a bear market. We previously advised against
betting on near term crashes. The NASDAQ chart looks
sick. The DOW simply is not far behind. The S&P
alternatively, is still bouncing off a longer term trend line.
|