|
August 2006
The
Landing Pad
The Landing Pad…As
you most likely know, or better know, housing is a classic leading
economic indicator in terms of forward directional trajectory of
domestic GDP. In the past, we’ve shown you the very strong
historical correlation between the NAHB (Natl. Assoc. of Home
Builders) housing survey and the year over year rate of change in
real US GDP. There’s no mistaking the relationship between
housing and the economy. And at the moment, the NAHB survey indicator
is pointing directly to a slowing of the macro US economy to come.
And very importantly, it’s not just the builders who are somber,
but their customers are also none too confident. Below is the University of Michigan survey component
regarding consumer sentiment toward real estate.
For effect we have overlaid the year over year change in US
payroll employment. Now
do you see why housing is so important a leading indicator?
Of course you do.

But as we step back a bit and
ponder longer term risk in both the real economy and in financial
asset prices that represent the real economy, a question of
importance is the ultimate magnitude of the “landing”, so to
speak, for the greater residential real estate cycle. Will
we achieve the proverbial soft landing the Fed must surely be
hoping for, or will it be a dreaded hard landing? Without
sounding melodramatic, the correct answer to this question is of
very meaningful importance if you ask us. Maybe really of primary importance over the next year or so. For at this
point, what happens to housing ahead involves not only the
domestic US economy, but also quite crucially the US credit cycle.
As housing “lands”, per se, so lands the broader US
economy? Let’s put
it this way, we think it’s a very good bet.
For now, the ultimate character
of a housing cycle soft or hard landing is unknown. Since
housing cycles play out over a period of years, as opposed to
months or quarters, it’s still probably a while to come until we
can offer up an intelligent answer as to the magnitude or depth of
the real estate cycle endpoint or trough. So what do we do in the meantime?
Of course, we watch and listen. We watch the numbers that
characterize the fundamentals of the industry and “listen” to
what the financial markets are predicting vis-à-vis financial
asset price movements. We thought we’d have a look at a
few of the items we’re watching in an attempt to formulate some
type of objective outlook moving forward. Let’s start with
a look at the DJ Home Construction Index. This relatively
broad index was very close to a ten bagger between early 2000 and
the summer of last year. In our minds, it’s literally the
picture that symbolizes the systemic liquidity bubble baton
handoff from stocks to residential real estate at the dawn of the
current decade. At recent levels, this index is down over
45% in just about 12 months. This type of price action
suggests a good bit of sector distress to us, but so far we have
not seen the real US housing sector or industry completely fall
apart. Remember, in the wonderful world of theoretical
efficient market theory, financial asset prices lead real world
outcomes. So for now, this index is telling us that the
coast is certainly far from clear when it comes to the real world
of domestic residential real estate.

As you can see, for now the
index has drifted below its 200 week moving average. As a
quick digression, the 200-week moving average is a very generic
target one can use if one believes a market, an asset class, or a
stock has entered a bear environment of substance. Is it a
picture perfect pinpoint level at which cyclical bear interludes
terminate? No, it’s a generic directional level more than
anything else. But for now, this index literally spent four
weeks dancing directly around the 200 week MA before declining to
the downside. What we’re getting at here is that if the
real world of US housing is to experience a soft landing, per se,
we’d absolutely expect the housing stocks as represented by a
broad index such as this to begin to bounce at some point probably
in the not to distant future. While the stocks that make up
this index decide in which direction they’ll choose to travel
next, the index itself is very oversold technically based on the
weekly RSI and stochastic indicators. In fact, the weekly
RSI has never been as oversold in the entire, admittedly short
term, history of this index as has been the case recently.
You’ll also notice the head and shoulders formation we’ve
drawn in the chart. If indeed this is a major top with
meaningful further downside to come, any rallies or bounces in the
index should be contained at the neckline approximating the 800
level. Of course from here that would be one heck of a
bounce. From a risk management standpoint, for anyone short
these issues, a potential northerly price departure from the
200-week MA should be watched closely.
Conversely, a sustained break
in this index below its 200 week MA would suggest the probability
of a hard landing in the real world of residential real estate
is
increasing. We’ve drawn in black the technical support
levels that lie below the current price. If indeed the head
and shoulders is not to be violated, it’s a good bet that this
index will see 400 or something quite close before it’s all
over.
Let’s head out to the real
world, Okay? Another indicator of importance in our eyes is
the new purchase mortgage application index brought to us by the
wonderful folks at the Mortgage Bankers Association. It’s
clear that the mortgage purchase index is well off of the highs of
early last year, indicating that residential real estate activity
has surely slowed. No massive surprise by any means.
But what we think is important is the fact that this index has
been stabilizing within a relatively tight range since
mid-February of this year. As you know, we’re in the heart
of what should be seasonal strength for housing sales right now.
Looking ahead, we believe a key in trying to assess the soft
versus hard landing scenario is whether the current stability, so
to speak, in the level of mortgage purchase applications holds.
If we can hold to possibly work higher from here, a dreamed of
soft landing may indeed be the outcome, at least for a while.
If the purchase apps index breaks down from the currently very
well defined bottoming level, the odds of a hard landing increase.
Simple enough? Soon
enough we leave the prime time residential real estate transaction
season. Will current
levels continue to hold?

As a bit of
an aside, although the housing industry stocks have absolutely
taken it on the chin lately, and the mortgage purchase apps are in
a clear downtrend, the stocks of companies that finance
residential real estate look nothing like their housing industry
counterparts as you'll see below. Why haven't these stocks
fallen as has real world real estate activity and the stocks of the
homebuilders, etc.? It's simple. Remember, as we've
told you on many occasions now, the financial economy IS
the real economy in the US. The fact that these stocks have
not cratered is simply testimony to the fact that market
participants are fully aware of this concept. At all costs,
the Fed will protect the financial economy. Isn't that
really the overriding implicit bet in the broader financial
markets these days? (Answer: Of course it is.)
Moreover, in all likelihood, another set of banking industry
executive brain surgeons may indeed take one or all of the folks
you see below out in M&A deals. Wachovia was the first
to jump into the real estate finance game after the cycle
of a lifetime has already been completed with the Golden West
merger. Who's next?
As you can see below, the stocks are waiting to find out.
Yes, even highly risky sub prime lender New Century seems to
implicitly be anticipating a bid. Oh well, banks and other
large financial institutions seem to be doing what they do best in
terms of market timing - buying exactly at the top of each cycle. As you
know, the multiplicity of brokerage firm buyouts by the banks in
the late 1990's and early in this decade worked out so well that
the mortgage lenders must be next, right?


Very quickly
an update on refi experience. Important not just from the
standpoint of attempting to characterize the ultimate depth of the
current housing cycle, but possibly much more meaningful, the character of
a key piece of the macro US credit cycle. So far, 2006 has
seen the worst refi unit volume activity in a half-decade at
least. And this is occurring while $1.2-1.5 trillion in ARM
debt is ready to reset over the next twelve to eighteen
months. A break below the 1200 level from here would suggest
the housing cycle is taking a turn for the worse and the chances
of a hard landing grow.

We have just a few last
historical perspectives that we believe are important in terms of
trying to assess the forward question of whether residential real
estate experiences a soft or hard landing as the total cycle plays
itself out.
Unfortunately neither of these will give us any kind of heads up
tip off as to the character of the housing cycle path to come.
They are more perspective on the magnitude of the cycle that has already
played out. They are found in the GDP report, which is necessarily
lagging data. But important in that they “show” us that
the most recent residential real estate cycle is something
completely different than anything experienced over the last half
century at least. So as we watch the housing stocks and related
indices ahead, the mortgage purchase data, as well as housing
starts, permits data, etc., we believe these views of life help us
frame the perspective of the cycle we have been living through up
to this point.
As we look back over historical
cycles of residential real estate investment as a percentage of
GDP, we have to ask ourselves, does a minor soft landing follow
the most extended US residential real estate investment cycle on
record?

It sure seems improbable, but
in today’s liquidity/credit driven world, anything can happen.
Although we will not drag you through another series of charts,
and although the relationship of residential real estate to US GDP
sits at a half century high as of 1Q of this year, the year over
year rate of change in nominal dollar residential investment
peaked some time ago. Moreover, NEVER has the rate of change
in year over year nominal dollar residential fixed investment not
gone into negative territory during or very near a US recession
until the most recent experience in 2001. In other words, the current
real estate cycle has broken all historical relationships set down
over the last sixty years at least. And the flip side of
this record-breaking cycle is a simple non-descript soft landing
and subsequent reacceleration upward? Hmmm, we'll see.
Although it seems to receive
very little comment, should we not be mindful of demographics?
In the chart below we’re looking at residential real estate
fixed investment and personal consumption expenditures as a
percentage of GDP, again over close to the last 60 years. It
seems pretty darn clear to us that the combo of real estate
investment (actually consumption from the point of view of
households) and consumer spending (PCE) as a percentage of US GDP
really began to take off as the baby boom generation came of age,
coinciding with the explosion in the financial services driven
economy we have come to know and love today. If indeed the
economy is to be influenced by the baby boom generation as we move
forward, we need to ask ourselves a few questions. Just how
many more homes do the boomers need to purchase, especially as
they go into their theoretical retirement years? As the baby
boom generation ages, we have to believe that the relationship you
see below begins to roll over. Regardless of what’s to
come, this is an important picture of the cycle we have already
lived through up to this point. Again, ask yourself, do we
simply experience a brief slowdown and then reaccelerate to all
new highs ahead?

Set against
the perspective of the charts above that tell us just how
extraordinary the current cycle has already been, we'll leave you
with one last question to ponder as we move forward. Will it
just be the level of interest rate movements ahead that will be
the primary determinant of how residential real estate influences
the US economy? Up to this point, cost of and ease of access
to credit has had
just about everything to do with the current real estate cycle. In other
words, will interest rates and residential real estate activity
decouple ahead post what has been the residential real estate
cycle of a lifetime? The following will give you a feel for
just how closely linked interest rate levels have been to housing
stocks and housing activity over the past decade and one half.
As you probably know, DR Horton is the largest homebuilder in the
US. (Notice our favorite LT technical indicators - 21 week
RSI in addition to 17 and 43 week EMA relationship - are very
negative here.)

Residential real estate
affordability depends on two key components - cost of capital and
price. As of the most recent readings (June of this year),
the housing affordability composite index rests at a low not seen
since mid-1989. The National Association of Realtors also
breaks down affordability between fixed and ARM buyers. The
ARM affordability component of the composite fell to a low not
seen for 20 years. We have the very strong feeling that
looking ahead, the character of residential real estate is not
going to be primarily dependent on cost of capital, but perhaps
more driven by price sensitivity than at any time in decades given
the leverage already built up at the household level. As we
said, real estate cycles are long dated by nature. Even
today, mortgage interest rates are well below anything seen prior
to 2001 dating back three decades. There's no question in
our minds that price remains today a major affordability index
depressant in the numbers we just quoted you from the NAR.
If indeed price and rates need realignment prior to strength
returning to affordability indices, does it really sound like an
ever so soft landing for residential real estate lies directly
ahead?
One last outstanding issue of importance is
the OCC mortgage lending guidelines to come. You may
remember that very early this year, the OCC (Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency - the banking system regulator) set
forth proposed guidelines that essentially mandate that banks
knock off no-doc, negative am, option ARM, etc. lending.
Well, it has been one of the longest "comment periods"
we've ever seen for this type of regulatory guideline enactment.
But, as of now, these guidelines are set to take
effect by the end of summer. The only loud vocal opposition
has come from the NAR (Natl. Assoc. of Realtors). We're
certain the guidelines will be enacted as almost completely
originally handed down due to the fact that neither Congress nor
the Senate even made a peep about them. So, there's going to
be additional mortgage credit cycle pressure yet to come. We
have not even experienced the fallout effects of this yet.
And it's clear that both consumer and industry sentiment is
literally plummeting prior to this . Will tightening the
mortgage credit tourniquet improve consumer sentiment towards
housing or make it worse? Go ahead and take a wild guess.
Lastly, it's only serendipity that so much ARM debt is set to
reprice at the exact time banks are being implicitly mandated to
stop risky mortgage lending, as they have enjoyed for so long now.
Oh those fat sub prime margins, right? We're gonna miss ya.
You
already know how we feel about the current housing cycle in terms
of its importance to the economy and our investment activities.
We’ll be watching these and many more data points very closely
as we move forward. Again, without sounding over the top,
the question of a soft or hard landing in US residential real
estate looms very large in our thoughts. The ultimate answer
will clearly reverberate throughout the real economy and US, as
well as global, financial markets for a time. We believe the
soft or hard landing in housing to come will also correctly point
us in the direction of outcome for the macro US economy.
Will the housing cycle airplane descend toward the economic
runway, but reaccelerate skyward prior to its wheels actually
touching the unforgiving asphalt of the landing strip? If
so, equities that represent the sector are going to need to find a
happy bottom in the not too distant future. They are going
to soon need to "show us" that a soft landing is indeed
a possibility, something that has not happened up to this
point. Or will the in
flight housing cycle hit the tarmac in a slow motion burst of
twisted metal and amid screams of mayday while unable to properly
engage its supposed landing gear? If indeed a hard landing
lies ahead for this industry and nouveau asset class, following
the charts will be an important exercise in terms of revealing the
ultimate flight path for both the industry and US economy.
Quite simply, either the stocks bottom soon, or they will be
pointing directly to the fact that the real world housing cycle won't, and by
default prospects for the broader US economy, which has been so
dependent on household asset inflation for so long, dim.
For
now, most anecdotes from the housing industry front point directly
to a hard landing. Single family housing permits are down
close to 25% from the top. The University of Michigan
housing sentiment number is back to recessionary levels seen a decade and one
half ago. Existing home prices just fell the greatest amount
in two decades on a month over month basis. The NAHB (Natl.
Association of Home Builders) housing index has experienced its
greatest nine month drop on record and now sits at a level
likewise seen 15 years ago. And if that's not enough to get
your attention, we'll leave you with a final set of current
"pictures" below that characterize residential real
estate inventories as they now stand as per the latest data.
Head'em
Up, Move'em Out...Although the large homebuilders have been
reporting new orders that have fallen drastically year over year,
the homebuilders, as is the case every cycle, find themselves in a
bit of a predicament at this particular juncture. To cut to
the bottom line, they cannot stop building on a dime. They
have so much money invested in each property (entitlement, permit,
infrastructure costs, to say nothing of the structure itself) that
they can't simply walk away without "stranding" massive
amounts of capital. Not an option. They need to finish
what they have started and blow out the inventory, which now
continues to grow by the day. For now, this is what we are
looking at in terms of units still under construction. See
what we mean? This does not turn down in an instant.
The builders still have a whole lot of "movin'em out"
still to do. We simply can't see how the most extended cycle
in history resolves itself without further price pain given the
level of current units still under construction in what is a
softening transaction environment.

Two final charts.
Probably the two most important variables when it comes to
equities are price and volume. That's what makes the world
go around. To be honest, maybe these are the two most
important variables that drive any asset class price cycle. Well,
what lies below are two little pictures of price and volume in the
wonderful asset class called residential real estate. In the
first chart we're looking at the number of US homes for sale
multiplied by the median US home price as of now. Without
sounding melodramatic, price and volume is telling us one large
and very important story here. We've never seen anything
like this.

Lastly, same data as above, but
this time around it's average price. Same conceptual
issue. To put it tactfully, we're off the charts here.

Can this
current dollar volume "inventory" situation in residential real estate
resolve itself without further ruffling a few price
feathers? Although the final hard versus soft landing
verdict on housing, and by extension the US economy, remains to be
delivered, storm clouds have clearly gathered and continue to grow
just a bit darker by the day. If we were you, we'd take a
few steps back from the proverbial housing cycle landing pad...just in
case. We're not so sure we want to be too close to this
thing when it lands.
|